Personal tools
You are here: Home eNewsletter Archives 2013 august2013 Labour-intensive science at a regional scale? SAEON joins the new Kruger-to-Canyons Environmental Monitors Programme
Research Infrastructures

EFTEON website

SAPRI Proposal

SMCRI website

Research Publications

SAEON RESEARCH 

OUTPUTS 2006-2017

Log in


Forgot your password?

NRF logo

 

 

Labour-intensive science at a regional scale? SAEON joins the new Kruger-to-Canyons Environmental Monitors Programme

By Dr Tony Swemmer, Manager, SAEON Ndlovu Node

The National Government's Expanded Public Works Programme (EPWP) has created many initiatives that aim to improve the management of natural resources in South Africa. These generally involve labour-intensive operations to implement desired management outcomes, modelled along the lines of the well-known Working for Water Programme.

Could EPWP funding also be used to monitor the state of natural resources, and contribute to the more scientifically orientated objectives of organisations like SAEON? The SAEON Ndlovu Node is exploring this possibility by participating in a new EPWP venture called the Environmental Monitors Programme.

Environmental monitors are unskilled workers recruited from previously disadvantaged communities, who are trained to record observations on key environmental changes in the area where they live. Their observations are recorded on hand-held GPS units, and the data is then brought together for archiving, analysis and distribution - to both managers of natural resources and the environmental science community.

Monitoring environmental changes in the K2C Biosphere Region

In July the SAEON Ndlovu Node employed six environmental monitors, who form part of a team of 86 monitors recently deployed throughout the Kruger-to-Canyons (K2C) Biosphere Region. SAEON staff members Tony Swemmer and Rob Taylor have been involved in the design of the data collection protocol and software used by most of these monitors, and the Node is hosting one of five data collators who are responsible for downloading and collating data from them.

The six environmental monitors employed by the SAEON Ndlovu Node:


0401a.jpg
0401b.jpg

Terecia Kgohloane (left) and Miranda Rakoma capture environmental data on a GPS unit around Makhushane village.


Gerald Kwinika is responsible for data capture and species identification.



0401c.jpg
0402.jpg

Lengaloi Seoki records data while Ronnie Segodi measures tree circumference, near Moloro village.


Thembi Marshall (right), who is based at the offices of the SAEON Ndlovu Node, is one of five data collators who manage and download data recorded by the environmental monitors. Thembi’s focus area is rivers and invasive alien plants.


Monitors have been deployed both in protected areas and rural areas (see map). In the case of the latter, monitors where recruited from villages where they live, and simply walk from home to patrol the surrounding rural rangelands daily, resulting in a highly cost-effective means of monitoring areas that are difficult to access (both physically and culturally) for most environmental scientists.

Two of the SAEON monitors are working in the rural lands of the Makhushane Tribal Authority on the outskirts of Phalaborwa, while three work from the villages of Craigieburn and Maloro, located in the foothills of Mariepskop Mountain, a developing observatory for monitoring environmental change on South African mountains.

The monitors are currently using Trimble Juno GPS units, supplied by the programme, for recording data in the field. CyberTracker, a free South African software product, was selected as the application for data capture and collation.

Themes

Data is collected according to five themes, with the exact variables recorded by each monitor customised according to the land use and biophysical environment where they work. The five themes, each encompassing a range of scientific questions about major environmental changes occurring in the region, are:

  • protected areas management (focused on data required to manage protected areas more efficiently);
  • rangeland monitoring (focused on the state of natural resources and biodiversity of terrestrial ecosystems);
  • freshwater monitoring (focused on the water quality and biodiversity of surface water resources);
  • environmental health (focused on disease and other factors affecting the health of people and animals); and
  • community engagement (focused on socio-economic trends in rural communities).

 

Host institutions

SAEON is one of ten host institutions who have employed environmental monitors within the Kruger-to-Canyons Biosphere Region, all through a partnership with SANParks, who is implementing the programme as one of the new EPIP (Environmental Protection and Infrastructure Programmes) of the Department of Environmental Affairs.

The other host institutions are Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency, private nature reserves (the Timbavati, Olifants-West and Sabie Sands), the Southern African Wildlife College, the Agricultural Research Council, the Universities of Pretoria and Witwatersrand and the K2C Biosphere Reserve (a non-profit organisation that is developing the UNESCO K2C Biosphere Region).

0403big.jpg

Locations where K2C environmental monitors have been deployed - at various nature reserves, private game reserves and rural villages throughout the lowveld of Limpopo and Mpumalanga.

Red boxes indicate locations where monitors patrol rural villages and rangelands.

Yellow boxes show where monitors work within protected areas.

The two boxes with blue borders show the placement of the SAEON monitors.

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0404big.jpg

A screen shot of the CyberTracker application used for data collection. The yellow dots indicate where environmental monitors have recorded observations while patrolling a protected area on the northern banks of the Letaba River. The panel on the right shows data for one particular record, located at the yellow triangle, which is the occurrence of a species of alien plant. The photo insert shows a photo of the species observed, which is downloaded with the GIS data, and allows for confirmation of the species identification by a data collator, or any other data users.

Document Actions